The 5-D Case
We obtain the 5-D convergent ratio vector by successive transformations of a base vector by the 5-D triangular matrix:
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | 1 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | × | 3 |
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 4 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 5 |
This leads to the sequence
5-D Sequence
1 | |
5 | |
15 | |
55 | |
190 | |
671 | |
2353 | |
8272 | |
29056 | |
| |
s1 |
2 | |
9 | |
29 | |
105 | |
365 | |
1287 | |
4516 | |
15873 | |
55759 | |
| |
s2 |
3 | |
12 | |
41 | |
146 | |
511 | |
1798 | |
6314 | |
22187 | |
77946 | |
… | |
s3 |
4 | |
14 | |
50 | |
175 | |
616 | |
2163 | |
7601 | |
26703 | |
93819 | |
| |
s4 |
5 | |
15 | |
55 | |
190 | |
671 | |
2353 | |
8272 | |
29056 | |
102091 | |
| |
s5 |
The Matrix Aspect
While in the 3-D case the convergent ratio led to s/m, s/l, m/l and inverse relations, six core matrices and four equations, the 5-D case creates many more. A core group of 20 5×5 matrices together with the 5×5 zero and identity matrices is required to build the matrix field for this convergent ratio. They comprise the solutions of the 5-D equations. Since negative solutions are included, there are 8 quintic equations to consider.
Here is a table of the core 5-D matrices:
Table of 5-D Core Matrices
s1→s5 (s5/s1)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
s1→s4 (s4/s1)
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
s1→s3 (s3/s1)
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
s1→s2 (s2/s1)
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
s5→s1 (s1/s5)
0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 |
0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
s5→s2 (s2/s5)
0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
0 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
-1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
s5→s3 (s3/s5)
0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
-1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
s5→s4 (s4/s5)
-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
s4→s3 (s3/s4)
0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
-1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
s3→s5 (s5/s3)
0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
s2→s4 (s4/s2)
-1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
s3→s2 (s2/s3)
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 |
0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
s2→s5 (s5/s2)
1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
-1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
s4→s1 (s1/s4)
-1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
-1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
|
s3→s4 (s4/s3)
-1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 1 |
1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
-1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
s2→s3 (s3/s2)
-1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
-1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
s4→s5 (s5/s4)
0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
-1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
s4→s2 (s2/s4)
-1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
-1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
|
s3→s1 (s1/s3)
-1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
-1 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 1 |
0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
s2→s1 (s1/sub>/s2)
1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
-1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 |
-1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Matrices by Size
Component Relations
There are many interesting patterns in these matrices, especially when compared to the 3-D and other matrix fields. The triangular matrix transforms s1 to s5 and this being the greatest transformation, we could call it the biggest matrix. The matrices in the first row can be consecutively subtracted from each other to produce the second row. Then those in the second row can be consecutively added to produce the third row (except the last).
-
- s5/s1 - s4/s1 = s1/s5
- s4/s1 - s3/s1 = s2/s5
- s3/s1 - s2/s1 = s3/s5
- s2/s1 - 1 = s4/s5
-
- s1/s5 + s2/s5 = s3/s4
- s2/s5 + s3/s5 = s5/s3
- s3/s5 + s4/s5 = s4/s2
- (s4/s5 + 1 = s2/s1)
-
- s3/s4 + 1 = s5/s2
- s4/s2+ 1 = s3/s1
- s1/s4 + 1 = s5/s3
- s1/s5 + s2/s3 = 1
- s1/s5 + s3/s2 = s4/s2
The 5-D Equations
It is simple enough to arrange the solutions and negatives in size order but then selecting 8 groups of 5 is not as easy as for the 3-D case.
Plan B: To obtain the 5-D equations we make use of the relations above to express all terms as functions of a single one. Here we will use s1/s5 because this method worked in the 3-D case.
(s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) = 1
= s1 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
+ s2 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
+ s3 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
+ s4 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
+ s5 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
= s5 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) × (s1/s5 + s2/s5 + s3/s5 + s4/s5 + s5/s5)
Now s5 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) = s1 / s5
And s1 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) = s1 / s5 × s5 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) = (s1 / s5)2
Moreover s4 / s5 = (s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
= (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5) - s1 / (s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5)
= 1 - (s1 / s5)2
And s2 / s5 = s2 / s1 × s1 / s5
= (1 - (s1 / s5)2) + 1) × s1 / s5 (because s2/s1 = s4/s5 + 1)
= (2 - (s1 / s5)2) × s1 / s5
Finally s3 / s5 = s3 / s2 × s2 / s5
= 1 / (1 - (s1 / s5)) × s1 / s5 × (2 - (s1 / s5)2)
= (s1 / s5 / (1 - (s1 / s5)) × (2 - (s1 / s5)2)>
At this stage we substitute r for s1 / s5 to obtain:
r(r + r(2 - r2) + r(2-r2)/(1 - r) + (1 - r2) + 1) = 1
or r5 - r4 - 4 r3 + 3 r2 + 3r - 1 = 0
back